<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Letter to Rep. Nancy Pelosi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://you-are.us/2006/02/01/open-letter-to-rep-nancy-pelosi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://you-are.us/2006/02/01/open-letter-to-rep-nancy-pelosi/</link>
	<description>we are you</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://you-are.us/2006/02/01/open-letter-to-rep-nancy-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 03:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://you-are.us/2006/02/01/open-letter-to-rep-nancy-pelosi/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Congress makes laws, the Judicial branch decides if they're constitutional, and the executive branch sees that they are followed. That's how it works. So congress can pass laws that are unconstitutional, that's included in the system of checks and balances. Bush ordering the NSA to do data-mining on Americans is in direct violation of a law enacted by congress the last time a president something like that. They didn't impeach the previous president for it; if they had, perhaps Bush would've thought twice about breaking the law. 

The problem is this is not democracy. Bush has removed this decision from the democratic process. Are we so afraid of "terrorists" that we are willing to allow our government access to everything we say or do and to use their best judgement to decide if those actions qualify us as a "terrorist" or not and are we also willing to give up the right to dissent against this, or even know that it's happening? Congress considered the issue and passed a law. Bush decided they weren't afraid enough of what the terrorist could do to us, so he needed to just ignore the law and do what he wanted to do. Well, if he felt that strongly about it then impeachment is a small price to pay for the safety of the American people, right? And really, this is only one of the many laws he is accused of breaking. Ditto for torturing people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress makes laws, the Judicial branch decides if they&#8217;re constitutional, and the executive branch sees that they are followed. That&#8217;s how it works. So congress can pass laws that are unconstitutional, that&#8217;s included in the system of checks and balances. Bush ordering the <span class="caps">NSA </span>to do data-mining on Americans is in direct violation of a law enacted by congress the last time a president something like that. They didn&#8217;t impeach the previous president for it; if they had, perhaps Bush would&#8217;ve thought twice about breaking the law. </p>

<p>The problem is this is not democracy. Bush has removed this decision from the democratic process. Are we so afraid of &#8220;terrorists&#8221; that we are willing to allow our government access to everything we say or do and to use their best judgement to decide if those actions qualify us as a &#8220;terrorist&#8221; or not and are we also willing to give up the right to dissent against this, or even know that it&#8217;s happening? Congress considered the issue and passed a law. Bush decided they weren&#8217;t afraid enough of what the terrorist could do to us, so he needed to just ignore the law and do what he wanted to do. Well, if he felt that strongly about it then impeachment is a small price to pay for the safety of the American people, right? And really, this is only one of the many laws he is accused of breaking. Ditto for torturing people.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://you-are.us/2006/02/01/open-letter-to-rep-nancy-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://you-are.us/2006/02/01/open-letter-to-rep-nancy-pelosi/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>To be fair though, Congress is full of people who have been making laws that ignore the Constitution for five decades or longer. So let's also open a dialogue on impeaching ever member of Congress if we're going to have one on impeaching Bush. Let's have a mass referundum where Americans are given the opportunity to throw everyone out at the same time and start over...but let's do it the way we always have, on election day.

Maybe if we could get more than 30% of adults to give a shit, we'd pick better leaders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair though, Congress is full of people who have been making laws that ignore the Constitution for five decades or longer. So let&#8217;s also open a dialogue on impeaching ever member of Congress if we&#8217;re going to have one on impeaching Bush. Let&#8217;s have a mass referundum where Americans are given the opportunity to throw everyone out at the same time and start over&#8230;but let&#8217;s do it the way we always have, on election day.</p>

<p>Maybe if we could get more than 30% of adults to give a shit, we&#8217;d pick better leaders?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
